tract_11| Woke-Machine.org | Download the tract_11
Scientific argument
Mathematics is often considered a universal, objective, and immutable discipline, based on logical principles and strict rules. However, challenging this traditional view of mathematics may be necessary to better understand its role in society and the social implications of its use.
A closer look at the fundamental concepts of mathematics reveals that they are based on postulates and axioms that are not necessarily consistent with social reality. For example, mathematical equality, symbolized by equations such as 1+1=2, assumes a uniformity and symmetry that do not always correspond to the diversity and disparities observed in society. Indeed, in social life, individuals are not interchangeable and equivalent entities, but rather complex beings with unique identities and experiences.
By deconstructing mathematics—that is, by questioning its foundations—we can pave the way for a more critical analysis of its impact on society. Deconstructing mathematics involves recognizing that mathematical concepts are not neutral and can convey ideas and values that reflect prejudices and prevailing social norms. For example, the use of mathematical symbols such as fractions and percentages may appear objective, but in reality, these mathematical representations can reinforce stereotypes and discrimination against certain population groups.
By challenging the supposed neutrality of mathematics, we can also shed light on the cultural and historical biases that have shaped the development of this discipline. For example, the history of mathematics reveals that many mathematical theorems and concepts were developed in specific contexts, where certain populations were marginalized or excluded. By examining these historical roots, we can better understand how mathematics has been used to legitimize and perpetuate social inequalities.
Deconstructing mathematics does not mean completely rejecting the discipline, but rather questioning its foundations and applications in order to promote a more inclusive and ethical approach. For example, introducing intercultural and intersectional perspectives into mathematics teaching can help raise students' awareness of the different ways in which mathematics can be perceived and used in society. Similarly, encouraging critical reflection on the biases and prejudices present in mathematics can foster a more equitable and democratic approach to the discipline.
Let's return to our example. Simply adding "1 racialized person" and "1 white person" is not enough to define equality between two individuals in terms of humanity. This mathematical equation does not take into account the differences in experiences, privileges, and oppressions that these two people may experience based on their ethnic origin. Social and historical constructs around race and whiteness profoundly influence individuals' experiences and opportunities, calling into question the idea of simple, uniform mathematical equality.
The notion of equality between a racialized individual and a white individual must be placed in a broader context of social justice and equity. Structural discrimination and social inequalities based on race cannot be erased by simple mathematical addition. Recognizing the systemic advantages and barriers faced by individuals based on their skin color is essential to understanding the complex dynamics of power and privilege that shape our societies.
Rather than seeking abstract mathematical equality between a racialized individual and a white individual, it is essential to recognize the differences and asymmetries that exist between racial groups. The fight against racism requires an awareness of structural injustices and a willingness to challenge the discriminatory norms and practices that perpetuate racial hierarchies. It is essential to promote an intersectional and anti-racist approach that recognizes the diversity and complexity of individual journeys based on their race, and this therefore, of course, requires a deconstruction of mathematics.
In conclusion, it appears that deconstructing mathematics is an essential process for challenging the norms and practices that underpin this discipline. By adopting a critical and reflective approach, we can promote a more responsible and ethical use of mathematics in society. By recognizing the limitations and biases of mathematics, we can contribute to its evolution towards a more inclusive, diverse, and equitable discipline.
Addendum 1
It is also undeniable that Western mathematics has been largely influenced by white men, and this has had consequences for the diversity of mathematical knowledge and perspectives. Indeed, by being developed primarily by individuals with similar cultural, social, and historical backgrounds, this mathematics tends to reflect their own experiences and perspectives, thus leaving out the contributions of women, people of color, and non-Western cultures.
This poses a major problem because diversity is essential for the advancement of knowledge. In mathematics, diversity allows for the exploration of new approaches, innovative problem-solving, and pushing the boundaries of the discipline. By neglecting the perspectives and knowledge of minority groups, Western mathematics risks remaining locked into a limited framework, devoid of creativity and innovation.
It is therefore necessary to promote greater diversity in mathematics by recognizing and valuing the contributions of women, people of color, and non-Western cultures. This requires openness to different mathematical approaches, inclusive training that includes the history of non-Western mathematics, and the promotion of diversity within academic and research institutions.
Ultimately, it is essential to recognize that Western mathematics cannot claim universality until it reflects the diversity of mathematical knowledge and perspectives. It is time to address the underrepresentation of minority groups in mathematics and promote a more inclusive discipline, open to a diversity of voices and talents.
Download the tract_11 A4 – PDF | X size JPG (600×1200)
We apologize in advance if anything on this page offends you. If that is the case, please go here.